The
trouble with a reviewing on Zero Dark
Thirty is that it wasn’t a movie. What you’ll get here is a series of news
articles acted out. Acted well, sure. I don’t mean to be dismissive of the talent
and skill on display here, as it’s considerable. But scenes come and go like
all they were meant to do is tick off another signpost on the way to bin
Laden’s head. Each ends with a “and here’s the general feeling of what just
happened”. People were scared, then angry, but then they got really scared
again, but then they got really angry. Those are the depths this film plumbs. Each
event is just evidence, justification, for the ending everyone knows is coming.
How did anyone get upset about the torture? All the film says is that it
happened and the public didn’t like it. There is no defense or condemnation. Characters
are likewise pushed along a flat progression. How did the same director do this
and The Hurt Locker?
There really
is no nuance here for me to write more about. The story is as you, no doubt, know
it. Nothing new was added. Should a passionless reminder of what the hunt for
Osama entailed, this is just the thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment